As we end this year living within a world we have never experienced before, one that has united us all globally but not in the way we would ever have known or wished for. 

We see ourselves entering a second year of lockdowns, preventions, implementation of emergency powers and mandates. What happened to ‘flattening the curve’, ‘within the next weeks’, ‘just until the end of this period’ – all false news, false hopes and false promises. People are beginning to push back, find alternatives to news and information rather than relying on mainstream to provide flawed and biased content – ‘but you need to follow the law’.
Since when has society evolved to allow 21 year shop assistant to become so empowered that she can scream at every customer entering the shop -“Wear a mask or you can’t come in – it’s the Law”.

People can’t enforce laws, even police officers can’t enforce laws. They are empowered to detain and arrest you if there are reasonable grounds that you may have impeached upon or broken a law – but they can’t legally apply that Law to you and state that you have broken it. That is the role of judge and jury and the many applications created under the judicial systems of that society. As the Judge was not present and was not a witness at the time the alleged Law was broken, a system of proving that the offender has broken the law must be presented, agreed upon by a group of selected peers and then judgement is passed as a final statement of application of the law. Minor judgements can be made by magistrates if it is clear and beyond doubt that the accused offender can be proven to have created an offense which has breached the Law. But not mandates, mandates are not Laws.

Mandates are rules that require certain conditions to be met but they are not legal enforceable laws. Mandates can be employed by anyone. An employer can mandate that all staff must wear suits and business clothes to work within their offices.  A building site may mandate under Health and Safety Rules that all working on the site wear a hard hat to prevent injuries from falling objects. So these type of mandates are useful to implement sensible precautions for all those requested to comply with them.

But there are other mandates that are employed by industry, commercial and individuals which are purely used to eject power and control into society. A restaurant may employ a mandate stating that a man must wear a tie in order to sit at their tables, even if they do not enforce the same rule to female customers. Beach side restaurants may insist on wearing clothing as opposed to beach wear when eating at their tables.

‘Do not walk on the grass’, ‘Do not park here’. DO NOT DO THIS or you must DO THAT are all forms of mandates, but they are not laws and not legally enforceable.

So, a mask mandate can be reasonably requested in areas which may attract large groups of people and therefore prevent the increased risk of spreading infection. This can be raised under governmental emergency powers to be required and implemented across a population in the case of a global or localised infectious disease pandemic. A mask does not prevent infection, it reduces the possibilities of inhaling large droplets of mucus / sputum through others coughing and sneezing creating concentrated droplets of potentially infectious material that is injected into the environment. This may land on surface areas and survive for short periods- hence the precaution of sanitisers and alcoholic gels which neutralise the effects of touching these surface areas carrying the potential infection. 

An airborne infection which may carry bacterial or viral material can still enter through the eyes or be breathed in by the individual – the mask merely reduces the quantity by acting as a filter. The masks that most individuals wear are not sealed around around the mouth and nose and those that loosely wear them on the chin, just to comply with the mandate, provide zero protection. Wearing a mask over a period of time acts as a two way barrier for the breath to exhale other toxins, bacteria and germs that are constantly present in the air and begin to concentrate the breath into a single area causing a warm damp environment ideal for the growth of bacteria. This may lead to other problems that cause respiratory, bronchial and pneumonia type symptoms.  The mask itself does not prevent the illness or disease – the size of the viral or bacterial cells are so minutely small, it would be like trying to carry sand in a shopping trolley – completely ineffective and pointless.

Despite the ongoing development of mRNA vaccines that focus upon the individual characteristics of a virus, it is already well proven that viruses mutate into other forms to avoid those vaccines becoming effective against them. The annual return of new colds (bacterial) and flu’s (viruses) clearly show the infinite variants that nature employs to any preventative measures that seek to eradicate its survival.

Speculatively speaking, the employment of preventative measures such as mass population vaccinations in the middle of a large pandemic may actually force the virus to mutate and create variants as a means of overcoming the impact of the vaccine. Therefore the vaccine is time limited on its effectiveness and requires constant changes to its own genetic makeup to be able to remain effective against variants exposed to a mass population.  The most effective means of combating any form of infection is the natural immune system that has proven to be fully effective for over 95% of the worlds population against the current SARS2/CV19 virus.  If an employed vaccine targets specific areas of the virus by weakening or neutralising the immune system firstly to allow it to employ its own payload into the body, this form of compromising the immune system means the individual may have further difficulty creating the necessary antigens or defenses against any other form of bacterial attack such as the natural colds and flu’s that already exist and particularly new variants of CV19 which are no longer prevented by the previous vaccinations and require new vaccinations or genetically altered boosters to be able to cope and keep up with the constant changes. This is not prevention, this is what evolution has already been doing for millions of years to keep this planet populated by life forms – natural adaption of the immune system. The film War of the Worlds illustrated this perfectly – that any form of alien species, in particular new viruses, are not adapted to this world and will therefore cease to exist within short periods of time.

The after effects of all we have been going through, I am sure, will continue to demonstrate that a healthy diet, frequent exercising, clean air and a respectful awareness of hygiene and cleanliness will go a long way to maintaining a natural ‘evolutionary designed’ functioning immune system to prevent and overcome many future illnesses, diseases and multiple environmental threats such as pollution and toxins that we are exposed to everyday. None of these have previously led to global shutdown, economic and political sanctions by governments against their own populations and and enforced mandates have taken us now beyond anything that could ever take us back to ‘return to normal’. That has gone forever.

It will be up to the individual to decide upon their own path and to no longer rely on the targeted and manipulated information produced by biased science, political lobbying and pharmaceutical companies that benefit far more from maintaining power and control through sickness and disease than in curing and preventing it.

Just like the mutated virus itself, the Sovereign Being has risen from amongst the destruction and corruption of civilized and cultured society.

When I was 18, late one evening, a friend and I had purchased a takeaway Chinese meal and drove both our cars to the nearby car park of a shopping precinct to eat and chat through the open windows of the cars. As we left the car park, I leaned out my car window and threw the empty cartons and containers into a litter / trash / garbage bin. We drove away,
The next moment, I saw blue flashing lights in my rear view mirror and a police car flashing headlights for me to stop which I did and my friend did also, ahead of me. The police officers approached my car and began a series of questions as to why I was in the car park late at night and what I had been doing there. I explained that I had just eaten a Chinese takeaway with a friend and was leaving to go home. The officers checked around my car and upon collaborating the same story from my friend, finding nothing else to hold us for, let us both go on our way. I arrived home and went to bed.

At 2am that morning, I was woken by blue flashing lights shining through my bedroom window. I got up, dressed and went outside to find the same two police officers searching around my car. They demanded that I open it and began searching inside the car. My parents walked up in their night clothes and asked what was happening and asked the police officers why they searching my car on private property as they had driven up the private driveway and were parked in the parking area behind our house.

The officer ignoring them, turned to me and said directly to me – “I am arresting you for breaking and entering a vehicle and stealing the contents of that vehicle”. I was speechless, my parents were speechless. I asked why they thought I had done that as I had already earlier explained the reason why I had been in the car park. He continued – “We went back to the area you said you had been and found a car that had its windows smashed in and the stereo had been taken from it. You are being arrested for that. You will be required to produce your full vehicle licence and documents and report to the local police station within seven days to answer to the offence”. Despite my protests, they then left, leaving me to explain to my parents that it had nothing to do with me and that I had stolen nothing.

The next day, I went to the police station with my documents and presented them to the desk officer. I was once again cautioned as to the offense that had been placed against me. I asked for full details of the report of the car being broken into and what exactly had been stolen. The officer read out the charge sheet to me – something didn’t seem right about the description. I asked when the report of the breakdown had been registered and the officer then read out the time and date – it was from the day before! The report of the break in and stealing of the stereo had been reported by the car owner from the previous day. It couldn’t possibly have been me committing the offense from the previous night. The desk officer looked once again at the charge sheet and without even looking up, said – OK, you are free to go, go on, you can go. I walked out of the police station angered but relieved.

I drove round to my friends house as he was just about to drive to the police station with his documents. He too had been charged the night before by the police officer’s night time visit. I explained that we were no longer being held responsible and didn’t need to do anything else.
We had a good laugh at the experience we had just been through. Unbelievable but true.

BUT, the story did not finish here!!

A week later, I am in my parents parking area washing my car. A police car once again drives onto my parent’s property and parks next to me. The same police officer as a week before – gets out and speaks –
“I am de-arresting you for the offence of breaking and entering a vehicle under ‘ whatever chapter and verse the law was'” – I don’t remember the details.
I smiled thinking what a fool he must feel having found out that the charge he had brought against me was false and could easily had been prevented had he just checked when the breaking and entering had been reported from the day before.

However, he then continued……….

“I am charging you with the offence of littering under Section 87 of the Environmental Protection Act”.
He handed me a sheet of paper and left, leaving me open mouthed and incredulous. The statement on the copy charge sheet showed that the officers had seen two cars leaving the carpark at midnight, upon following and stopping the cars, they questioned the drivers who admitted they had been eating a Chinese takeaway in the car-park and had only just left to go home when they were stopped. After releasing the two individuals, we drove back to the carpark and found the contents of their Chinese takeaway lying upon the floor. – a crumpled brown paper bag containing a plastic spoon. They have committed an offence under Section 87 of the Environmental Protection Act and have been charged with said offense. The matter will be placed with the local Magistrates Office to be dealt with accordingly.

So, the rest of the contents had made it into the bin, but not the brown paper bag and the plastic spoon which could really have been anybody’s, however my explanation had tied me directly to it being there lying on the ground in the carpark, no mention of the contents of the litter bin on the charge sheet.
Again – unbelievable!

A month later, I appeared at the local magistrates court. I was cautioned before hand and upon trying to explain the reason why I was having to appear at court, I was told that the breaking and entering incident could not be submitted as ‘mitigating evidence’ as it had no bearing on the offence I had been charged with – which was littering which brought its own chargeable offence of a ‘small fine’. So, all evidence pointed me to being a guilty participant of being an uncaring and irresponsible citizen having wilfully thrown the discarded remains of my night-time Chinese meal out of my car window into the public car-park. I was fined £100 and my friend also was fined £100 – so £200 for the most expensive Chinese takeaway meal I have ever eaten!!

The story was brought to the attention of the local newspaper who decided to place it as a column on their front page news for the day. Teenager fined £100 for takeaway littering – and went on to highlight the ignorance of youth not caring about their environment and the consequences of a fine for committing the offense if done so.

One good thing came out of all this – since that time I make absolutely sure that I have never dropped litter ever again and always always use an appropriate container for the disposing of litter. Even these days, the lesson still plays out as I have taken part in many beach clean ups on the sandy beaches of Koh Samui in Thailand to remove the layers of plastics and junk that regularly pile up on the shorelines there.